This approach converts zero trust from an architectural goal to an operational feedback system. Each linkage is verified not only against access policies but also against active threat flows.
CISO use case: Prioritizing by linkage impact
Consider two simultaneous alerts:
- A phishing domain targeting the finance department.
- A compromised API key in a DevOps integration.
Both seem essential, but which deserves immediate attention?
A traditional feed-based approach might treat them equally. The ULM view quickly shows that the API key sits on a high-trust, high-inheritance linkage — it connects the build system to production containers and those containers share adjacency with customer data stores.
The phishing domain, by contrast, leads to isolated user inboxes with strong controls. By quantifying the linkage weight, the CISO can prioritize the DevOps compromise, knowing that its flow potential — the ability to move from one system to another — is far higher. This is attack-path prioritization, not just vulnerability management. It is the difference between chasing every indicator and focusing on the flows that matter.
Toward a flow-based defense
Security teams often describe their posture in terms of perimeters, boundaries, endpoints or controls. But adversaries don’t think in boxes — they believe in flows. They exploit the connective tissue: the forgotten trust token, the unmonitored CI/CD handoff, the shared SaaS credential.
The ULM provides a way to think and act like an attacker while maintaining the analytical rigor of a defender. By modeling linkages, CISOs can:
- Visualize attack surfaces: Understand not just what assets exist, but how they relate to each other.
- Quantify propagation risk: Measure how fast and far a compromise could move.
- Operationalize threat intel: Feed dynamic linkage updates into monitoring and response playbooks.
- Align intelligence with compliance: Demonstrate to auditors and boards that risk is understood in context.
In practice, adopting ULM doesn’t require replacing existing tools. Most organizations already possess the data — network maps, identity graphs, vulnerability scanners and threat feeds.
ULM unifies them into a linkage framework, transforming siloed outputs into a coherent risk narrative.
The CISO’s call to action
For decades, we have been trained to collect — logs, indicators, feeds. The next era of cybersecurity requires that we understand connections: how elements interact, inherit and propagate.
By adopting a linkage mindset, CISOs can elevate threat intelligence from reactive to predictive. The ULM provides the analytical bridge between static data and dynamic defense — a means to see threats not as isolated alerts but as flows of intent moving through digital ecosystems.
The message is simple but powerful:
Stop simply reading threat feeds.
Start mapping threat flows.
That is how you operationalize threat intelligence in the age of rhizomatic, interconnected systems — and how CISOs finally gain the visibility to act, not just react.
Additional details are available in my original research paper: Unified Linkage Models: Recontextualizing Cybersecurity (United States Cybersecurity magazine).
This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?
