The researchers identified sprint-style plans, detailed technical specifications, and task breakdowns that appeared to be generated programmatically rather than authored manually. Code comments, architectural consistency, and repetitive implementation patterns further suggested that an AI system was responsible for producing large portions of the framework.
Additionally, as per Check Point’s analysis, VoidLink grew to tens of thousands of lines of code in under a week, a pace that would be difficult for even a skilled development team to sustain. While a human operator likely guided the process, AI handled much of the execution, generating code, refining modules, and accelerating iteration cycles.
Unlike previous examples of AI-assisted malware, which often relied on basic scripts and reused open-sourced components, AI appears to have driven end-to-end development of VoidLink.
